|
|
Post by eticket on Oct 5, 2011 7:37:27 GMT -6
Does any one know of big block twin turbos with inter-coolers being used on an altered. Has it been done? and what if any consideration for rules, shields for the exposed turbos. I'm thinking of converting but logistics are problematic. Location of inter-cooler for one. Don't have a lot of room.
|
|
|
|
Post by sg3526 on Oct 5, 2011 9:28:32 GMT -6
Most altereds have some type of nose piece on them. Hide it under there
|
|
|
|
Post by mongse on Oct 5, 2011 14:36:11 GMT -6
Why not run methanol and eliminate the need for an intercooler?
As for NHRA rules, there are very few rules specifically for turbos. If the turbos are outside the bodywork, I'd look into getting a blanket for them. It'll help hold the heat in on the exhaust housing and guard against shrapnel in case of a failure.
I'd also make sure to route the exhaust in a manner so you can't dump oil on the tires if a bearing or seal should fail in the turbo.
|
|
|
|
Post by eticket on Oct 7, 2011 11:50:36 GMT -6
After staring at the chassis for 1/2 a night I'm not sure I can get it all to fit. There is no room in the nose for anything. The computer and fire bottle are up there along with the radiator, fan and 4qt. heat sink for the trans. I'm trying to figure out if I can get the turbos in front of the motor (this is a twin turbo motor. ) I've been looking on line to see if any one else has done this so I don't have to re-invent the wheel. This has got to be the way to go. You can tune the h.p. According to Nelson racing in California 1500 with 91octaine and 2500 with a combination gas/ methanol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crossbones Dennis on Oct 7, 2011 19:50:21 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Crossbones Dennis on Oct 7, 2011 19:55:46 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by eticket on Oct 10, 2011 8:54:56 GMT -6
Thanks it's true a picture is worth a thousand words or in this case weeks of agrivation
|
|
|
|
Post by W333 on Oct 10, 2011 18:02:22 GMT -6
I've made quite a few runs against your car. I always liked it. The car is very well engineered and clean. It goes straight and runs the number. I guess what I'm saying is.............Why mess with it!! It seems to be a winning combo. Unless your kinda like me and just can't leave well enough alone.  |
|
|
|
Post by eticket on Oct 11, 2011 4:24:59 GMT -6
My son says the same thing. The problem is I always want to try something new which does not always work out.
|
|
|
|
Post by sg3526 on Oct 11, 2011 6:06:38 GMT -6
My son says the same thing. The problem is I always want to try something new which does not always work out. One of my favorite sayings; treat it like a sore d#%k and don't f*@k with it!! If it works leave it alone. Although I heard you sold your engine and the injection off it. |
|
|
|
Post by eticket on Oct 11, 2011 10:45:15 GMT -6
Yep. But I have more than enough parts to build another motor. It's amazing how much you collect over the years and cubby hole away. Actually didn't know I had this much 'till I started rooting around. Just trying to see if I can make this work. I still have another Ron's injection system complete with manifold less a fuel pump. If I can't get into the 4's I'll be unhappy. I was this close (5.14 )
|
|
|
|
Post by eticket on Oct 11, 2011 10:47:14 GMT -6
Also thought I would have more time. Didn't expect anything to happen next year
|
|
|
|
Post by eticket on Jan 22, 2012 9:16:18 GMT -6
Just a up date. After serious review, the turbo experiment will be a dream down the road. So now we are picking up our new 632 inch engine next week and will be trying to get it set up. We are hoping for the 4.7 range
|
|
|
|
Post by W333 on Jan 22, 2012 9:39:49 GMT -6
As we all know some things look great on paper but in real life require a lot of modification to work properly. It sounds like the Turbo motor not fitting is a blessing in disguise. I'm sure your new 632 will be just what the doctor ordered to put the car in the mid 4's.  |
|
